rina

 

 

 

 

 

WHAT IS NAVAL ARCHITECTURE? – WHAT IS A NAVAL ARCHITECT?

 

Engineering may be defined as a 'profession directed towards the skilled application of a distinctive body of knowledge based on mathematics, science and technology, integrated with business and management, which is acquired through education and professional development. It is dedicated to developing and providing infrastructure, goods and services for industry and the community.’ Correspondingly, the Engineer may be defined as ‘one who has and uses scientific, technical and other pertinent knowledge, understanding and skills to create, enhance, operate or maintain safe, efficient systems, structures, machines, plant, processes or devices of practical and economic value.’

But how today should that branch of engineering called Naval Architecture be defined? What is a Naval Architect? The Royal Institution of Naval Architects can trace its origins back to the Society for the Improvement of Naval Architecture, whose formation in 1791 stemmed from a concern about the apparent superiority of French warship design. However, to simply define the naval architect as one who designs ships would of course be to ignore those who are involved in the many other aspects of maritime technology, including the education of naval architects,

In 1999, members and non-members were invited to suggest suitable definitions of Naval Architecture or Naval Architect. The following is their response as published in RINA Affairs, together with definitions used by various organisations, but the list is not definitive and further suggestions are welcomed.

Trevor Blakeley, Chief Executive

 

…A FAIRLY COMPLEX SUBJECT.

Naval Architecture, especially in its engineering sense - which is the harmonious combination of those basic factors that produce seaworthiness, speed, safety, balance, buoyancy, comfort and utility - is a fairly complex subject.

Carl Lane, Penobscot Boat Works

…ATTITUDE

Naval Architects – Shipwrights with Attitude!

Michael Gray

…THE ORIGINATOR/MANAGER OF A SITUATION….

The definition of shipwright is that of ‘an artisan skilled in one or more of the tasks required to build ships,’ Michael Gray’s description is, nevertheless, provocative and today’s Naval Architect is much more than simply a descendant of Noah.

Naval Architecture (Ship Design Engineering) of some years ago, could be considered a euphemism, when shipbuilding was not an ‘exact science’ but more of an art. Today, a ship design engineer is trained to be the originator/manager of a situation, capable of promoting safety standards based upon sound analysis, experimental testing and in-service experience. He or she is far more than an “artisan.” The application of computers in shipbuilding has replaced the cylindrical slide rule, known at the time as the ‘barrel’ (now a museum piece), and has made ship design and construction a mature technology.

Today’s CAD/CAM systems not only enhance quality, they save time and costs. These systems, together with extensive use of Computational Fluid Dynamics, which solves complex fluid problems, and three-dimensional graphics, which are computer generated visualisations of a ship’s structure, enable the ship design engineer to integrate solutions, from conceptual stage of a design to the fabrication of a ship/maritime structure, while the concept is still on the design board.

Andrew G Spyrou FRINA

…CONCEIVE OF, DESIGN, TEST, BUILD, AND OPERATE…

Engineering is an open-ended process during which scientific knowledge is converted to useful products for the benefit of society. In order to perform this transformation, an engineer must be inquisitive and broadly educated, he or she must be knowledgeable in the sciences and in the language of engineering - namely mathematics, and he or she must be well educated in the fundamental courses common to all engineering disciplines - courses in: statics, dynamics, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, materials, electrical theory, and experimental techniques.
Naval architecture is that field of engineering which addresses how we can apply our acquired wealth of knowledge to conceive of, design, test, build, and operate all types of ships and boats - recreational to naval, small to big, operating on or under the sea, sails to nuclear, etc.

US Naval Academy Annapolis

…COMBINES IMAGINATION, ARTISTIC INSTINCTS, AND PROVEN SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES…

Naval Architecture combines imagination, artistic instincts, and proven scientific principles, tempered by basic engineering considerations, in designing the means of ocean transportation of the future. The many types of ships, boats and vehicles needed to operate on, under, or above the ocean's surface provide the broad field in which the designer is to work. The challenge to the naval architect is to convert the functional requirements into an effective, workable, and cost-efficient design.
The Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering,
<i.

…A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF ALL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES…

Naval architects must have a general understanding of all engineering disciplines because they generally start the process of designing a ship. After they determine its basic size and shape, they address hull form and resistance, propulsion power requirements, ship structure, weight distribution, stability, and the efficient location of the many compartments throughout the ship.

American Society of Naval Engineers

…ALL ASPECTS OF LEARNING, DESIGNING, BUILDING AND SMOOTH RUNNING OF VESSELS…

Naval Architecture is a discipline, associated with other types of engineering needed for vessels to be completely independent units of floating objects in water, under various conditions of interaction of the wave and the wind in all aspects of learning, designing, building and smooth running of vessels; while a naval architect is a person who is fully and professionally educated in this discipline.

Shyama Prosad Ghosh, FRINA

…SHIP DESIGN ENGINEERING…

Naval Architecture is ship design engineering. A Naval Architect is a ship design engineer, responsible for the design of ships, ensuring structural strength for the ship to remain afloat, and stability to remain upright, to survive the forces of the seas and other hazards. The guiding principle of safety is paramount.

Andrew G Spyrou, FRINA

…DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ASPECTS…

May I suggest that Carl Lane’s definition lacks certain essential ingredients:
i.e. one who designs ships (Ca, 1885), extended to include other marine structures,
i.e. one associated with one or more of their design, construction and operation aspects,
strength is also rather important as are efficiency and economy in performance, first cost and operational costs.

D. Faulkner FRINA

…DESIGNING A SHIP AND PREDICTING ITS BEHAVIOUR…

The definition of ‘naval architecture’ has changed since the term first came into use. The earliest published use of the phrase ‘naval architecture’ appears to date from 1629, when Architectura navalis by Josephum Furttensbach, was published (in Latin) in Frankfurt, and immediately translated throughout Europe. It was essentially a how-to book on building various ship types (galleons, brigantines, etc.), and did not include any scientific principles underpinning ship design. The meaning of naval architecture was much different then, and encompassed a much broader range of topics. For example, the book L'Architecture Navale by Sieur Dassie, published in Paris in 1677, lists the following headings:

·  Dictionary of geometrical terms

·  Dictionary of nautical terms

·  Correct proportions (length/beam/depth/mast heights) of vessels of various ranks

·  Inventory of articles aboard a war vessel

·  War maneuvers

·  List of officers and sailors aboard a vessel and their functions

·  Construction of a galley and a longboat

·  Tables of longitude, latitude and tides of principal ports

·  Description of ports and anchorages in the East and West Indies.

Only a few chapters are devoted to what we would nowadays call ‘naval architecture’; the rest deal with shipboard operations such as victualling, navigation and naval tactics. More importantly, in the words of an English naval architect, ‘it does not appear that there was a single principle, deduced from science, employed to determine any of the conditions stated in that work’.

The first book that could be accurately called a work of scientific naval architecture was Traité du Navire, published by the French astronomer Pierre Bouguer in 1746. In it, he developed many of the fundamental principles of naval architecture still in use today, for example, the metacentric theory of stability, the use of beam theory in determining hull strength, and the trapezoidal rule. The book was the first great synthesis of naval architecture, as well - previous books concentrated on one aspect such as maneuvering. It was roughly the equivalent of Newton's Principia Mathematica in terms of its scope and effect on the world of ship design. Traité du Navire was divided as follows:

BOOK 1: GENERAL IDEA OF CONSTRUCTION

·  Section 1- Shape of the Vessel and how to Trace it

·  Section 2 - Apparatus of the ship, including rudders, masts, cordages

·  Section 3 - Strength of the Ship, including its Wood and Ropes

BOOK 2: THE VESSEL CONSIDERED AFLOAT, BUT NOT MOVING

·  Section 1 - Weight of the vessel, its buoyancy and loading

·  Section 2 - Distribution of the weight of the vessel, including a description of the metacenter

·  Section 3 - Rolling and pitching of the vessel

BOOK 3: THE VESSEL CONSIDERED IN MOVEMENT

·  Section 1 - Examination of the shock of fluids; the wind on the sails, and the water on the hull

·  Section 2 - General solution to the principle problems of maneuvering

·  Section 3 - Properties the vessel must have to steer well

·  Section 4 - Qualities the vessel must have to carry sail well

·  Section 5 - Properties the vessel must have to be fast and keep a straight course.

This format has remained essentially unchanged for naval architecture textbooks for over two hundred years; the latest edition of SNAME's Principles of Naval Architecture is also divided into three books, each of which covers roughly the same topics.

Bouguer unfortunately does not provide us a definition of naval architecture. However, one quality of his book was its focus on modeling the ship in mathematical terms and predicting its behavior prior to construction; previous books mainly spoke of how to build the ship without attempting to say anything about how the ships would behave once built. So, one element of a definition of naval architecture should be the prediction of a ship's behavior and characteristics before it is built. In this respect, naval architecture is different from the art of the shipwright, which seeks to build the ship (or boat) but does not necessarily aim at discovering how it will behave once built.

The aspect of science should play heavily in the definition. John Fincham's book A History of Naval Architecture (1841) uses the phrase ‘The Application of Mathematical Science to the Art of Naval Construction’. Unfortunately, his book covered naval battles more than it did science

It also helps to look afield. Every issue of The Structural Engineer, the journal of RINA's next-door neighbour, the Institution of Structural Engineers, carries the following definition: ‘Structural engineering is the science and art of designing and making, with economy and elegance, buildings, bridges, frameworks and other similar structures so that they can safely resist the forces to which they may be subjected." Ships are more than just structural entities, of course, but the analogy with respect to hydrostatics, hydrodynamics, etc., is clear. Thus, another part of the definition should speak to the ability of the ship to safely and efficiently respond to its element, the sea (this is a broad-brush term for all navigable waters).

So - as a first cut attempt at a definition of naval architecture, pulling in the historical and analogous constituents, I propose the following: ‘Naval architecture is the application of scientific and engineering principles to designing a ship and predicting its behavior and characteristics, so that it will safely and efficiently respond to its element, the sea.’

Larrie D. Ferreiro FRINA

The science of designing ships and other waterborne craft.

Random House dictionary,

A designer of ships.

The Concise Oxford Dictionary

A STUPID MECHANIC …..

If we survey a vessel, what an exalted idea we must form of the ingenuity of the carpenter, who framed such a complicated, useful and beautiful a machine? And what a surprise must we feel when we find him a stupid mechanic, who imitated others, and copied an art, which, through a long succession of ages, after multiplied trials, mistakes, corrections, deliberations and controversies, had been gradually improving? Many worlds might have been botched and bungled throughout an eternity, ere this system was struck out; much labour lost; many fruitless trials made; and a slow but continued improvement carried out during infinite ages in the art of ship building

‘Dialogues concerning Natural religion, Part V’
David Hume (Scottish philosopher 1711 – 1776)

…THE USE OF THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE WITHIN THE SHIP DESIGN PROCESS…

A study of the development of naval architecture during the Scientific Revolution prompts the question ‘what is scientific naval architecture?

In focusing that study on the development of the theories and tools that allowed for a more scientific basis of naval architecture, and how they became incorporated into ship design, the important distinction between ‘naval architecture’ and ‘ship design’ must be made. A shipwright can design and build a perfectly good ship without the use of any theory and with little calculation or geometry, except for a few rules of thumb based on past experience. Naval architecture is the process that allows him to define and accurately predict the characteristics and performance of that ship before it is built.

To some extent, this split between naval architecture and ship design can be seen in SNAME's two publications, Principles of Naval Architecture and Ship Design and Construction. One deals with theoretical and empirical knowledge, the other with practical implementation. In this regard, ‘rules of thumb’ and use of geometry is only a small part of the picture - they are very good for giving a ship based on what has worked previously, but do not serve to predict how an entirely new ship will float, how strong it will be or how fast it will go.

Even today rules of thumb is used on a routine basis. When I designed destroyers and frigates, I used a set of L/B, B/T, etc., rules. Length-to-hull-depth ratio (L/D) was kept at 10-15, on the grounds that over 15 gave unusually high stresses and made the hull too flexible to maintain accurate weapons alignment (there were other reasons, too). Under 10 meant that the structure was not working efficiently, i.e., minimum thickness for local loadings governed, so the hull steel was thicker (therefore heavier) than what was needed for longitudinal strength. The ideal balance was a hull thickness that adequately met both local loads & hull girder loads. Now, shipwrights in the past also had these geometrical rules of thumb - but all they knew is that if L/D was too big they would get cracking and splitting in the wood.

‘Scientific’ naval architecture allows the designer to calculate the stresses and see beforehand if he has an efficient structure - in short, it gives him the rational basis for his gut reaction or experience. In this respect, modern ship design is begun by using the kinds of rules of thumb known to the most ancient shipwrights - but science and engineering ‘inform’ the designer throughout the design process, and allow him to accurately predict both the characteristics and performance of his ship before the first steel is cut. This differentiates ‘naval architecture’ from ‘ship design’, in a sense making naval architecture as a part of the ship design process.

A naval architect is therefore someone who uses those principles in that process (he/she is not necessarily a ship designer - lots of naval architects specialise in hydrodynamics, structures, etc., and not in the overall design). Therefore, another potential definition for naval architecture is:

‘Naval architecture is the use of theoretical and empirical knowledge within the ship design process, to predict the characteristics and performance of the ship before it is built.’

And for a naval architect:

‘A naval architect is one who uses theoretical and empirical knowledge as part of the design process, to predict the characteristics and performance of the ship before it is built.’

Larrie D. Ferreiro FRINA

 

Printer Version

 

RINA, 10 Upper Belgrave Street, London, SW1X 8BQ
t: +44 (0)20 7235 4622 f: +44 (0)20 7259 5912 e: hq@rina.org.uk

powered by novacaster

© 2000-2005 RINA